Now accepting submissions
Culture, Education, and Future
e‑ISSN 2980-2741 Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. 3 · Issue 2 · 2025 Oct 17, 2025 Editorial Conclusion

Mirror and instrument: Higher education as reluctant partner of the nation-state

ER
Ethan W. Ris Corresponding University of Nevada, Reno eris@unr.edu United States
Pages331-338 PublishedOct 17, 2025 LicenseOpen Access
PDF
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): CEF Journal
VOL 3 · NO 2 · 2025 CEF Journal View issue

Abstract

Higher education plays a double role vis-à-vis the nation. It is a mirror of a nation’s politics, reflecting the needs and aspirations of a populace and a government. Simultaneously, it is an instrument of those very politics, operating not just as a set of institutions where teaching and learning happen, but a locus of national identity, legitimation, economic and scientific action, and societal progress. The seven articles in this issue are shining reminders of these dynamics and, most importantly, evidence that the mirror/instrument dual identity extends across vastly different contexts of time, geography, and nationhood. At the same time, the articles make clear that the process of developing that identity is hardly natural or automatic. It is instead the fruit of contestation, extending my own remarks on the higher education system in the United States: “It is the product of contests and compromises, attacks and counterattacks, ideas and exigencies” (Ris, 2022).

References

  1. Gutierrez, R. A. E., Le, A., & Teranishi, R. T. (2021, August). A racial reckoning: Anti-Asian racism and exclusion in higher education (Research in Brief). Education Trust–West. ERIC Report No. ED614487. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED614487
  2. Key, S. (1996). Economics or education: The establishment of American land-grant universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780256
  3. Levine, E., & Stevens, M. L. (2022). Negotiating the academic social contract. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 54(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2022.2006562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2022.2006562
  4. Loss, C. P. (2011). Between citizens and the state: The politics of American higher education in the 20th century. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691148274.001.0001
  5. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
  6. Nash, M. A. (2019). Entangled pasts: Land-grant colleges and American Indian dispossession. History of Education Quarterly, 59(4), 437–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2019.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/heq.2019.31
  7. Nelson, A. J. (2023). Exchange of ideas: The economy of higher education in early America. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226828503.001.0001
  8. Palmadessa, A. P. (2017). American national identity, policy paradigms, and higher education: A history of the relationship between higher education and the United States, 1862–2015. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59935-3
  9. Pieke, F. N. (2018). Party spirit: Producing a communist civil religion in contemporary China. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 24(4), 709–729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12913
  10. Rabban, D. M. (2024). The pursuit of academic freedom: Foundations and future. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674297807
  11. Ris, E. W. (2022). Other people’s colleges: The origins of American higher education reform. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226820231.001.0001
  12. Ris, E. W. (2023). A good crisis: Emergencies and the reframing of American higher education, 1944–1965. Peabody Journal of Education, 98(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2216087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2216087
  13. Schrum, E. (2019). The instrumental university: Education in service of the national agenda after World War II. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501736643.001.0001
  14. Schulze-Cleven, T. (2020). Organizing competition: Regulatory welfare states in higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 691(1), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220965891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220965891
  15. Sorber, N. M. (2017). Land-grant colleges and popular revolt: The origins of the Morrill Act and the reform of higher education. Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501709739
  16. Stevens, M. L., & Shibanova, E. (2021). Varieties of state commitment to higher education since 1945: Toward a comparative-historical social science of postsecondary expansion. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1944252 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1944252
  17. Williams, B. C., Squire, D. D., & Tuitt, F. (Eds.). (2021). Plantation politics and campus rebellions: Power, diversity, and the emancipatory struggle in higher education. SUNY Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438482699
  18. Wilson, W. (1902). Princeton for the nation’s service. Science, 16(410), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.16.410.721 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.16.410.721

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues