Now accepting submissions
Culture, Education, and Future
e‑ISSN 2980-2741 Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. 4 · Issue 1 · 2026 Jun 26, 2026 Articles

Education after waste: Transactional ecologies, dissensus, and the reconstruction of curriculum

PP
Paul Parkison Corresponding University of North Florida paulparkison@gmail.com United States
WW
William White James Madison University United States
Pages4-19 PublishedJun 26, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
PDF
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): CEF Journal
VOL 4 · NO 1 · 2026 CEF Journal View issue

Abstract

This article examines how neoliberal educational reforms generate a wasted curriculum—knowledges, histories, and human capacities rendered expendable by standardization, accountability, and efficiency-driven schooling. Grounded in Dewey and Bentley’s transactional ecology, the analysis challenges interactional models of education that privilege closure and control over emergence and relationality. The concept of haecceity is mobilized to foreground irreducible difference and resist the fetishization of sameness that underwrites curricular waste. Drawing on Isabelle Stengers’ cosmopolitical account of time and relational emergence, the article reconceptualizes waste as a site of unrealized democratic and ecological potential. Case studies from museum pedagogy, including Mining the Museum and Curating Discomfort, illustrate how dissensus and discomfort disrupt hegemonic narratives and reopen suppressed histories. The article concludes by advocating for curricular reconstruction through transactional, plural ecologies that reclaim waste as a pedagogical resource and sustain democratic possibility.

Keywords

References

  1. Alger, J. (2025). Mining the museum. Making the Museum. https://www.makingthemuseum.com/newsletter/mining-the-museum
  2. Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563
  3. Armiero, M. (2021). Wasteocene: Stories from the global dump. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108920322
  4. Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892046
  5. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
  6. Bataille, G. (1985). Visions of excess: Selected writings, 1927–1939. University of Minnesota Press.
  7. Benjamin, W. (2005). On the concept of history. Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/benjamin/1940/history.htm
  8. Braidotti, R. (2013). Nomadic ethics. Deleuze Studies, 7(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2013.0116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2013.0116
  9. Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_2
  10. Carstens, D. (2018). Cultivating a dark haecceity: A pedagogy of the uncanny and dark transports. Parallax, 24(3), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496583
  11. Clarke, D. A. G. (2024). Haecceity altercation: Thisness as pedagogy. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(8-9), 748-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231172224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231172224
  12. Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2016). From places to paths:Learning for Sustainability, teacher education and a philosophy of becoming. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1002-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554
  13. Clay, M., & Parkison, P. (2026). Monkeywrenching the curriculum: Curricular subversion as an act of care. Critical Questions in Education, 17(1), 77–88.
  14. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Athlone Press.
  15. Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thought. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.17966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.17966
  16. Dewey, J. (1997). Democracy and education. The Free Press.
  17. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press.
  18. Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
  19. Du Preez, P., Le Grange, L., & Simmonds, S. (2022). Re/thinking curriculum inquiry in the posthuman condition: A critical posthumanist stance. Education as Change, 26. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11460
  20. Duns Scotus, J. (2024). Treatise on the first principle (Hackett Classics ed.; T. M. Ward, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.
  21. Dye, J. F. (2003). From values based on simplicity and standardization toward the realities found in complexity and contingency: A particular view for high school during the 21st century. The High School Journal, 87(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2003.0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2003.0022
  22. Eisner, E. W. (1982). Cognition and curriculum. Longman.
  23. Gershon, W., & Wozolek, B. (2024). Sound traumas: Curricular attunements for care and educational understandings. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 39(1a), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v39i1a.1175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v39i1a.1175
  24. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The theory of affordances: 1979. In J. J. Gieseking, W. Mangold, C. Katz, S. Low, & S. Saegert (Eds.), The people, place, and space reader (pp. 56–60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816852-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816852-11
  25. Giroux, H. A. (2011, January 4). In the twilight of the social state: Rethinking Walter Benjamin’s angel of history. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/in-the-twilight-of-the-social-state-rethinking-walter-benjamins-angel-of-history/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2011.587310
  26. Giroux, H. A. (2014). The violence of organized forgetting: Thinking beyond America’s disimagination machine. City Lights Publishers.
  27. Gottlieb, D. (2020). A democratic theory of educational accountability: From test-based assessment to interpersonal responsibility. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019159
  28. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
  29. Harper, V. (2025, February 13). Henry A. Giroux on “The violence of organized forgetting”. Truth Out. https://nnomy.org/index.php/en/what-is-militarization/the-militarization-of-u-s-culture/item/680-henry-a-giroux-on-qthe-violence-of-organized-forgettingq.html
  30. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2007). Dialectic of enlightenment (G. S. Noerr, Ed.). Stanford University Press.
  31. Jackson, P. W., Boostrom, R. E., & Hansen, D. T. (1993). The moral life of schools. Jossey-Bass.
  32. Kantaris, G. (2016). Waste not, want not: Garbage and the philosopher of the dump (Waste Land and Estamira). In C. Lindner & M. Meissner (Eds.), Global garbage: Urban imaginaries of waste, excess, and abandonment (pp. 52–67). Routledge.
  33. Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  34. Liboiron, M., & Lepawsky, J. (2022). Discard studies: Wasting, systems, and power. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12442.001.0001
  35. Parkison, P. T. (2019). The incompleteness of standards and the potential for deliberative discourse. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v34i2.703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v34i2.703
  36. Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (K. Ross, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
  37. Rancière, J. (1995). On the shores of politics (L. Heron, Trans.). Verso.
  38. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
  39. Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472547378.ch-001
  40. Saltman, K. J. (2024). The politics of education: A critical introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432005
  41. Snaza, N. (2019). Animate literacies: Literature, affect, and the politics of humanism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478005629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478005629
  42. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2014). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769165
  43. Snaza, N. (2017). Is John Dewey’s Thought” Humanist”?. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 32(2), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v32i2.627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v32i2.627
  44. Siegel, M. L. (2004). The moral disarmament of France: education, pacifism, and patriotism, 1914-1940 (No. 18). Cambridge University Press.
  45. Stengers, I. (2011). Thinking with Whitehead: A free and wild creation of concepts. Harvard University Press.
  46. Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press.
  47. Tarc, A. M. (2011). Reparative curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(3), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00554.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00554.x
  48. Tenam-Zemach, M., Conn, D. R., & Parkison, P. T. (2021). Unraveling the assessment industrial complex: Understanding how testing perpetuates inequity and injustice in America. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367854065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367854065
  49. Weldon, P. (2018). Early career teacher attrition in Australia: Evidence, definition, classification and measurement. Australian Journal of Education, 62(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944117752478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944117752478
  50. Whitehead, A. N. (1979). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed., D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, Eds.). Free Press.
  51. Wozolek, B. (2021). “It’s not fiction, it’s my life”: LGBTQ+ youth of color and kinships in an urban school. Theory Into Practice, 60(1), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2020.1829383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2020.1829383
  52. Wozolek, B. (2024). Critical consent curriculum: Towards ethical self-empowerment in schools. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 39(4), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v39i4.1099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63997/jct.v39i4.1099

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues

Artificial intelligence in academic performance optimization: A systematic literature review

Ismail Olaniyi Muraina, Moses Adeolu Agoi, Solomon Onen Abam, Bashir Oyeniran Ayinde, Wasiu Olatunde Oladapo

This paper is a systematic literature review article that aims to examine how Artificial Intelligence (AI) could help enhance the academic performance of computer…

#Artificial intelligence #academic performance #dropout prediction #educational technology
p. 35-60
10.70116/29802741153