Now accepting submissions
Culture, Education, and Future
e‑ISSN 2980-2741 Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. 3 · Issue 2 · 2025 Oct 17, 2025 Articles

Imagining the imperial future: University and reform in the Ottoman Empire

KM
Kevser Muratovic Corresponding University of Vienna kevser.muratovic@univie.ac.at Austria
Pages192-208 PublishedOct 17, 2025 LicenseOpen Access
PDF
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): CEF Journal
VOL 3 · NO 2 · 2025 CEF Journal View issue

Abstract

Conventional histories portray the Ottoman Darülfünun as a belated, derivative transplant of the European university. Drawing on historical contextualism and discourse analysis, this article reads the reform decrees, ministerial speeches, and by-laws that punctuated the school’s stop-start career as argumentative interventions—windows onto the problems late-Ottoman statesmen believed higher learning could solve and the futures they hoped to inhabit. Three intertwined logics surface: moralised expertise (science valid only when yoked to virtue), linguistic standardisation (Ottoman Turkish as the civic idiom of rule), and territorial patriotism ( vatan  re-imagined as dynastic homeland). Following the first proposal in 1845 to the Hamidian statute of 1900, these logics reveal how higher education shifted from a pragmatic method of crisis management to a durable methodology of governance, displaying an instance of a nationalizing empire. The Darülfünun endured until 1933, when it was recast as Istanbul University, carrying its imperial-national synthesis straight into the republican era. Its longevity shows that both late Ottoman and Kemalist regimes turned to higher learning to fuse technology, faith, and shared belonging into a single, durable strategy of state-building.

Keywords

References

  1. Afacan, Ş. (2021). Searching for the soul in shades of grey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, (32). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.7248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.7248
  2. Akgündüz, A. (2011). The Ottoman waqf administration in the 19th and early-20th centuries: Continuities and discontinuities. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 64(1), 71–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43282397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AOrient.64.2011.1.5
  3. Aksan, V. (2007). Ottoman wars, 1700–1870: An empire besieged. Routledge.
  4. Anscombe, F. (2012). The Balkan revolutionary age. Journal of Modern History, 84(3), 572–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/666053
  5. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. W. W. Norton.
  6. Ash, M. G. (2006). Bachelor of what, master of whom? The Humboldt myth and historical transformations of higher education in German-speaking Europe and the US. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00258.x
  7. Barakat, N. E. (2023). Bedouin bureaucrats: Mobility and property in the Ottoman Empire. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503635630
  8. Barkey, K. (2016). The Ottoman Empire (1299–1923): The bureaucratization of patrimonial authority. In P. Crooks & T. H. Parsons (Eds.), Empires and bureaucracy in world history: From late antiquity to the twentieth century (pp. 102–126). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316694312.006
  9. Becker, C. H. (1916). Das Türkische Bildungsproblem: Akademische Rede, gehalten am Geburtstag Sr. Majestät des Kaisers in der Aula der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität. Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.
  10. Bourner, T., Rospigliosi, A., & Heath, L. (2020). The fully functioning university. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781839824982
  11. Çiydem, E. (2018). Tanzimat Dönemi Eğitim Islahatının Aynası: Maârif-i Umûmiye Nizamnâmesine Dair Mazbata (Esbâb-ı Mûcibe Lâyihası) [The Mirror of Educational Reforms in the Tanzimat Era: Report on the General Education Regulation]. Turkish History Education Journal, 7(2), 509–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17497/tuhed.461153
  12. Dölen, E. (2008). II. Meşrutiyet Döneminde Darülfünun [The Darülfünun during the Second Constitutional Period]. Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları, 10(1), 1–46.
  13. Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Schofer, E. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford University Press.
  14. Engelhardt, É. (1882). La Turquie et le Tanzimat: Histoire des réformes dans l’Empire ottoman, depuis 1827 jusqu’à nos jours [Turkey and the Tanzimat: History of Reforms in the Ottoman Empire from 1827 to the Present Day]. A. Cotillon. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Partie exemplaire N° 2, P89/4054 (Microfiche), Identifiant: ark:/12148/cb30400750j.
  15. Erozan, B., & Turan, İ. (2004). The development of political science in Turkey. PS: Political Science & Politics, 37(2), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004512
  16. Evered, E. (2012). Empire and education under the Ottomans: Politics, reform and resistance from the Tanzimat to the Young Turks. I. B. Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755607723
  17. Findley, C. V. (1980). Bureaucratic reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Sublime Porte 1789–1922. Princeton University Press.
  18. Fortna, B. C. (2002). Imperial classroom: Islam, the state, and education in the late Ottoman Empire. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199248407.001.0001
  19. Göçek, F. (1996). Rise of the bourgeoisie, demise of empire: Ottoman Westernization and social change. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195099256.001.0001
  20. Hanioğlu, M. Ş. (2008). A brief history of the late Ottoman Empire. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829682
  21. Hasebe, K. (2018). The 1869 Ottoman Public Education Act: Proceedings and participants. The Journal of Ottoman Studies, 51, 181–207.
  22. Heilo, O., & Chovanec, J. (2021). Narrated Empires: Perceptions of Late Habsburg and Ottoman Multinationalism. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55199-5
  23. İhsanoğlu, E. (2010). Darülfünun: Osmanlı’da kültürel modernleşmenin odağı [House of sciences: The focal point of cultural modernization in the Ottoman Empire]. IRCICA.
  24. İkdam. (1900, September 2 / 1316, August 20). No. 2219. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Retrieved June 28, 2024, from https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html#m
  25. Kolland, D. (2024). A strategic Eurocentrism: The construction of Ottoman evolutionism in an uneven world (1870–1900). Modern Intellectual History, 21, 328–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244324000040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244324000040
  26. Lohmann, I., Böttcher, J., Mayer, C., & Kesper-Biermann, S. (Eds.). (2021). Wie die Türken in unsere Köpfe kamen: Eine deutsche Bildungsgeschichte. Julius Klinkhardt.
  27. Mardin, Ş. (2000). The genesis of Young Ottoman thought: A study in the modernization of Turkish political ideas. Syracuse University Press.
  28. Mecmua-i Fünun (1279/1863). No. 7. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Retrieved September 21, 2024, from https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html#m.
  29. Mehmed Esad. (1893). Mir’ât-ı Mekteb-i Harbiye [The Mirror of the War Academy]. Artin Asaduryan Matbaası. Süleymaniye Vakfı Archives.
  30. Mills, A. (2008). Streets of memory: Landscape, tolerance, and national identity in Istanbul. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  31. Nelson, A. R. (2024). Capital of mind: The idea of a modern American university. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226829210.001.0001
  32. Nelson, A. R., & Wei, I. P. (2012). The Global University: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2012.665398
  33. Okumuş, O., Tuğluloğlu, F., & Yıldırım, C. (Eds.). (2022). 20. Yüzyılda Türkiye-Batı ilişkileri [Turkey-West relations in the 20th century]. Eğitim Yayınevi.
  34. Özata, M. (2007). Atatürk, bilim ve üniversite [Atatürk, science, and university]. TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Kitapları.
  35. Palabıyık, M. S. (2015). International law for survival: Teaching international law in the late Ottoman Empire (1859–1922). Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 78(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X14001037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X14001037
  36. Pamuk, Ş. (1987). The Ottoman Empire and European capitalism, 1820–1913: Trade, investment and production. Cambridge University Press.
  37. Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. Routledge.
  38. Roshwald, A. (2001). Ethnic nationalism and the fall of empires: Central Europe, Russia, and the Middle East, 1914–1923. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203187722
  39. Rüegg, W. (Ed.). (2004). A history of the university in Europe: Volume 3, universities in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (1800–1945). Cambridge University Press.
  40. Salnâme-i Nezaret-i Maarif-i Umumiyye [Yearbook of the Ministry of Public Education] (1321/1903). ISAM Digital Archive. Retrieved October 1, 2024, from https://isamveri.org/salname/sayilar.php?sidno=D02473
  41. Schreiben des Hrn. Dr. Busch an Prof. Brockhaus. (1863). Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 17(4), 711–807.
  42. Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of politics: Volume I: Regarding method. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790812
  43. Somel, A. (2015). 1869 tarihli Maârif-i Umûmiyye Nizâmnâmesi, esbab-ı mucibe layihası ve ideolojik temelleri. In K. Kahraman & I. Baytar (Eds.), Sultan Abdülmecid ve dönemi (1823–1861) (pp. 136–167). İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kültür A.Ş. Yayınları.
  44. Takvim-i Vekayi. (1261/1845). No. 280. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html#t(Accessed May 15, 2024).
  45. Takvim-i Vekayi. (1262/1846). No. 303. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, National Library Directorate, National Library. Retrieved April 7, 2024, from https://dijital-kutuphane.mkutup.gov.tr/tr/periodicals/catalog/details/952.
  46. Takvim-i Vekayi. (1280/1863). No. 710. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. Retrieved November 18, 2024, from https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html.
  47. Takvim-i Vekayi. (1286/1870). No. 1192. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html#t(Accessed April 25, 2024).
  48. Takvim-i Vekayi. (1286/1870). No. 1193. Hakki Tarik Us Collection. TC. Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Beyazıt State Library, and Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. https://www.tufs.ac.jp/common/fs/asw/tur/htu/list2.html#t(Accessed April 25, 2024).
  49. Taşdemirci, E. (2010). Türk eğitimi tarihi [History of Turkish education]. Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık.
  50. Topal, A. E. (2020). Order as a chronotope of Ottoman political writing. Contemporary Levant, 5(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/20581831.2020.1710668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20581831.2020.1710668
  51. Topal, A. E. (2021). Political reforms as religious revival: Conceptual foundations of Tanzimat. Oriente Moderno, 101, 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340261
  52. Topal, A. E., & Wigen, E. (2022). Diagnosing the state: Medical metaphors in Ottoman political writing. Die Welt des Islams, 62(3), 299–324. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00623A02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-62030002
  53. Turnaoğlu, B. (2017). The formation of Turkish republicanism. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691172743.001.0001
  54. Yalçınkaya, M. A. (2015). Learned patriots: Debating science, state, and society in the nineteenth-century Ottoman Empire. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226184340.001.0001
  55. Yalçınkaya, M. A. (2022). Globalizing ‘science and religion’: Examples from the late Ottoman Empire. The British Journal for the History of Science, 55(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087422000292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087422000292
  56. Zürcher, J. E. (2010). The Young Turk legacy and nation building: From the Ottoman Empire to Atatürk’s Turkey. I. B. Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755610761

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues