Language & Section
Language Policy
Scholarly Insights accepts manuscripts only in English. Authors could use either British (-ise) or American spelling for their manuscript; however, one style should be used consistently throughout the manuscript.
The manuscripts submitted to the journal should have a plain and clear language quality and should be consistent with the scientific literature and English language rules. Manuscripts should be written fluently and free of foreign words.
Scholarly Insights journal provides a complimentary final basic proofreading service for accepted manuscripts to ensure that they meet the journal's language standards and are free of grammatical and typographical errors before publication.
Section Policy
Scholarly Insights accepts research articles, critical perspectives, short communications, review articles, and book reviews.
Research Articles
Research articles should be highly scientific papers using qualitative, quantitative, mixed, and single-subject methodology and focusing on topics related to the aims and scope of Scholarly Insights. Scholarly Insights seeks submissions connecting applicable suggestions with quality practices. Theory, policy, and practice are expected to be tightly connected in the submitted papers.
Review Articles
Review articles should link theory and practice and produce critically informative resources for educators, practitioners, and policymakers. Scholarly Insights seeks submissions that are in line with its aims and scope and critically combines applicable proposals with quality practices. Theory, policy, and practice are expected to be tightly connected in the submitted papers.
Critical Perspective Articles
Critical discussion/perspective articles should focus on key concepts or common ideas in Scholarly Insights journal's aims and scope, discussing current advances or future directions from personal views and opinions. These articles should have an innovative, provocative, and original perspective between theory and practice in the Scholarly Insights journal's aims and scope.
Short Communications
Short communications are brief reports of original research or significant findings that provide a concise yet impactful contribution to the field. These submissions should focus on presenting new data, innovative methodologies, or preliminary findings that are relevant to the aims and scope of Scholarly Insights. While brief, these communications should be thorough, including essential figures, tables, and references to support the findings. The integration of theory, policy, and practice should be evident, highlighting the relevance and potential implications of the research. Submissions should maintain clarity and precision, ensuring that the significance of the work is communicated effectively to the readership.
Book Reviews
Book reviews should critically assess recently published books in areas relevant to the aims and scope of Scholarly Insights. Reviews should provide a comprehensive overview of the book’s content, evaluate its contribution to the field, and discuss its relevance to current theory, policy, and practice. The review should offer insightful and constructive critiques, highlighting both the strengths and potential areas for improvement. It should include an analysis of how the book contributes to the existing body of knowledge and its practical applications for educators, practitioners, and policymakers. The reviewer should provide a balanced perspective, offering a clear recommendation regarding the book’s value to the journal’s audience. The review should be engaging and informative, serving as a valuable resource for readers seeking to stay informed about the latest publications in the field.
*Prepared by the publisher, reviewed, and approved by Scholarly Insights Editors and commissioned Editorial Board Members. Updated on 27 June 2024.
